In pursuance of the recommendations of the "Task
Force on Improvement of Higher Education in Pakistan" the
government has constituted the Higher Education Commission with wide
financial power and autonomy. It will replace the present University
Grants Commission and would work in proactive and supportive fashion
with the objective to help promote higher education and research, said
Minister for Science and Technology Dr. Attaur Rehman on Friday, last
week.
The Task Force was notified in April 2001. The force
was a private public partnership comprising 17 leaders of higher
education and co-chaired by Syed Babar Ali (Pro-Chancellor of Lahore
University of Management and Sciences) and Dr. Shamsh Kassim Lakha
(President of Aga Khan University Karachi). The President Gen. Pervez
Musharraf who received a briefing by the Task Force on its findings on
April 11, 2002, approved the recommendations by the force.
The UGC, which was established by in 1974, was found
by Force as an ineffective organisation, which had failed to meet the
expected goals. The report observed, "The University Grants
Commission (UGC) was established in 1974 by an act of Parliament for
maintaining standards of education and uniform policy aimed at bringing
about national unity and cohesion. Assessment of financial needs of
universities, disbursement of grants, and building institutional
capacity are also amongst its functions. With no control on funding the
UGC nevertheless serves as a transmitter of the universities' annual
budgetary requests to the Ministry of Education and distribution of
Federal Government's grants to the universities (generally less than
requested and not always delivered on time). This has contributed to
erosion of its credibility with universities."
Addressing a press conference here with a focus on
HEC Ordinance recently approved by the Federal Cabinet, the S&T
Minister said, "as per the national development priorities the new
body is meant to lay down policies and guiding principles. Basically,
the HEC would guide, support and facilitate the universities and would
smoothen the functions of degree awarding institutes of the country
rather than becoming a hindrance and intrusion in the functioning".
The Minister explained that the ordinance was the
result of successful meetings by the new Ministry of Science and
Technology with the federal and provincial education ministries, UGC,
Vice Chancellors, governors, steering committee on higher education and
renowned educationists.
Dr. Atta said the commission would be an independent
statutory body and its head would enjoy the powers of a Federal
Minister. It would comprise 16 members plus an executive director. The
members would include secretary ministry of education, Secretary
Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Director or Secretary to
the Commission, four educationists, one from each province nominated by
the respective provincial governors while the remaining seven members
would include teachers, researchers and administrators. One of the seven
miscellaneous members will be a female.
Amongst the VCs, one would be from the private sector
besides two other members as well. The secretariat would be functioning
as the executive body of the Commission meant to implement orders,
decisions, directives and policy.
Dr. Atta said, it would advise federal and provincial
governments on proposals for granting charter, needs of the
institutions, approval and provision of funds on performance and need
basis.
The HEC would also carry out rating of the
educational institutions, set up of national testing bodies besides
laying down minimum criteria, setting qualifications for appointment and
promotion of faculty, forming committees in various disciplines for
advice on various issues.
"The HEC is also assigned to focus on supporting
programmes for economic development, performance and need-based funding
after peer review by national/ international experts, evaluation of
quality of education and ensuring minimum internationally compatible
standards", the S&T minister explained. Earlier the Minister
for Finance, Shaukat Aziz disclosed that education sector reforms would
cost over Rs.55 billion over a 5 years period as against an average
expenditure of Rs. 5 billion annually from federal government on
education sector. The government is however, determined to arrange the
required funding, he added.
The setting up of Higher Education Commission by the
cabinet to guide, support and facilitate the universities is believed to
bring about a positive and effective change in the environment of higher
learning institutions, besides enabling them to be more responsive to
the demands of the country. The failure of the University Grants
Commission in delivering the goods has been felt for long. The lack of
alignment between the university education and the needs of developing
countries prompted the government to look for alternative arrangement,
which could help achieve the desired results with the scarce resources.
The importance of all the tasks assigned to the HEO is self-evident.
However, one consistent flaw in most official reform efforts is the
absence of an objective evaluation of the causes of the problem intended
to be fixed.
In the present case, for example an education policy
already exists, the curriculum is also laid out and on top of it all
sits an overgrown University Grants Commission and, of course, the
Education Ministry. Yet, the public (as well as most private sector)
education has become such a disaster that most Master's degree holders
are barely literate in the fields of their so-called specialisation. The
Federal Public Service in its annual report last year lamented that the
academic standard were deteriorating so badly that it was becomingly
difficult for the commission to find suitable candidates for the various
posts.
HEC will require a lot of money to put all its new
plans into practice. Some of the immediate financial needs can be taken
care of from the grant that the US had recently made specifically for
the purpose of promoting education in this country. But it has to be an
ongoing endeavour. We have to look at our own resources to increase the
budgetary allocations to this vital sector. Given the sense of
priorities of our successive governments, it is useless to expect that
those who take over power in the days to come will earmark sufficient
resources to education, though no one can dispute the fact that
investing in education means investing in the future progress and
development of the country.
The report of the Task Force has rightly pointed the
deplorable fall in the quality and standard of education in the
institutions of higher learning in the public sector and identified some
of its causes as well. Surprisingly however, it has not touched upon one
of the most important problem of the education sector — the rising
cost of education and its commercialision by the private sector
institutions. The cost of education in any standard institute of higher
learning has gone almost beyond the reach of lower middle and even the
middle class families living in their honest income. These are the
segment of the society from where the talent normally emerge. This
precious potential for future national requirement is being wasted by
our sheer neglect. The government institutions lack the proper
facilities whereby our talented youth can be polished and prepared. On
the other hand the expenses in the quality education centres in the
private sector (most of them are substandard which are fleecing the
ignorant students and their parents) are prohibitive for this class of
students.
The federal education Minister Zubeda Jalal, however,
believes that the partnership of private sector was necessary to expand
the educational facilities. The government efforts alone, cannot meet
the nation's demand in this field. She however, emphasises the need of
developing of code of ethics for the educational institutions in private
sector, a strict charter of requirements before licensing any one to
enter in this field and close surveillance and monitoring of their
operations by government agencies.
Explaining of the salient features of the new
education policy recently finalized by her ministry, she said a key
element of the education sector reforms agenda is the development of
partnerships between the private and the public sectors and with the
NGOs.
Each sub-sector includes a strategic role for the
private sector. The government has also proposed a package of incentives
for the private sectors presence. But at the same time we will supervise
their operation through close monitoring. Grant of charter to private
universities would be provisional on scholarship to meritorious needy
students, she added.
This condition alone does not hold any promise if the
cost of education in these institutes of standard will be brought down
to an affordable level for the students belonging to lower and middle
class of our society or whose parents are used to living within their
honest means. Few scholarships by these universities cannot meet the
problem.
The only way out, under the circumstances seems to be
liberal grant of interest free education loans to the needy students
which may be paid back by them in easy installments when they are
employed after completing their education. The loan should be available
to only those needy students, who fully qualify the admission test by
the government approved educational institutions in the private sector
and is so recommended by them. The amount of loan should be based on the
need of the student and if necessary, it should be adequate enough to
cover, besides tutions fee and etc. the living expenses in the hostel.
This is a practice which is being followed since
decades in the civilized world and has contributed tremendously to
expand the higher education. Malaysian example is worth following.
Students apply for admission to universities and other institutions.
They are selected to pursue the courses of their choice. On the basis of
this selection they apply to government treasury for education loan. The
loan for the whole duration is approved in a very short period so that
the students' time is not wasted and they join the courses on time.
The loan amount is not given to the student but is
directly deposited in the institution's account every month. The student
in turn enters into a contract or signs a bond that he will pay back the
amount in so many years after completing the education. There is also a
provision for insurance in case the student meets with an accident. The
insurance money is included in the approved loan. If a student stops
attending a course the remittance of the fees is stopped and the
institutions cancels his admission.
|