|
AVIATION
INDUSTRY
THE CRUNCH
|
PIA, Private Airlines and CAA have to work
together to find solution of various issues concerning the industry
By
SYED M. ASLAM
June 10 - 16, 2002
The national flag carrier Pakistan International
Airline (PIA) enjoyed a complete monopoly on domestic sector and
guaranteed share on the foreign till the introduction of 'open sky
policy' a decade ago. The policy aimed at deregulating the commercial
aviation business to encourage private investment in the aviation
sector has come a full circle without achieving the desired
objectives.
Many blame the failure on the inability of the
policy makers to draw a line between encouraging investment and
opening the national and foreign air corridors to foreign airlines
which used it as an opportunity to pick and drop passengers at the
main hubs in the country. Also forgotten was the fact that the policy
offered incentives to the foreign airlines at the expense of PIA and
domestic airlines without registering their aircraft in the country.
In short, observers say that it offered benefits to the foreign
carriers without making any commitments whatsoever in total disregard
of globally accepted rule of bilateral civil aviation agreements
allowing a foreign airline a matching frequency against a domestic
airline to protect local airlines.
The policy has failed to induct a single aircraft
in the national aviation sector. The two private airlines still
operating in the country are flying aircraft rented on 'wet lease'
basis mostly from Eastern European countries. The term 'wet lease'
means that the owner of the aircraft provide the pilots and bear the
repair costs, if any, while the local operators provide the cabin crew
at their own expense. Thus, these aircraft flying the skies under the
colours of local airlines are neither registered in the country nor
owned by the private domestic airlines.
Today, many private airlines have closed their
operations barring two which share a negligible portion of the
domestic traffic and even a lesser share of the foreign air traffic,
and that too only in the Gulf Area. Meanwhile, the PIA is facing
increased competition from foreign airlines, particularly on Middle
East, Far East and Europe sectors. The situation has resulted in
dependence on foreign airlines which are lifting increased
international passenger traffic, both in and outbound, due to
decreased capacity of the PIA and the other two domestic airlines
combined.
Four private airlines; Raji, Hajviery, Safe and
Bhoja, the last after six years of operations, have already wrapped up
their operations. The remaining two — Aero Asia and Shaheen — are
comprise 4 and 5 aircraft respectively, all of them rented on wet
lease. The fleet of Shaheen Air International (SAI) comprises a total
of 5 aircraft — 3 short-haul Russian made Yak 42 Ds leased from a
Ukrainian company and 2 medium-haul Russian made TU 154s. Aero Asia,
on the other hand, has a fleet of 4 aircraft, 3 Yak 42s and one Boeing
737.
PIA: THE STRUGGLE FOR SURVIVAL
While PIA is still lifting the highest number of
domestic air travellers and also a large number of the overseas
traffic years of financial mismanagement, excessive staff, and
dilapidated fleet have taken a heavy toll on its performance. Though
the airline, which has been in red for last couple of years, managed
to earn a token operating profit of Rs 366 million in the year ended
December 31, 2001 compared to an operating loss of Rs 3 billion in the
previous year, it still kept on reeling from substantial pre- and
post-tax losses. The accumulated losses touched Rs 12.8 billion,
exceeding the paid-up capital of Rs 3.8 billion by Rs 9 billion posing
a big question mark for its very survival. Pre-tax and post-tax losses
were reduced but still stayed at high levels of Rs 1.9 billion and Rs
2.2 billion respectively.
As at March 31 this year, the airline managed to
show an overall profitability for the first time in two years earning
operating profit of Rs 1.7 billion in the first quarter ended compared
to operating loss of Rs 196.4 billion in the comparative period last
year. Similarly, PIA managed to earn pre-tax profit of Rs 1.1 billion
over a loss of Rs 615 million and post-tax profit of Rs 1.04 billion
compared to post-tax loss of Rs 671 million during the same period
last year. While the improved performance helped the airline reduce
its accumulated loss by Rs 1 billion to Rs 11.8 billion it still
exceed its paid-up capital by a massive Rs 8 billion.
In addition, PIA is facing serious cash flow
problems to keep its fleet operating which include many aging aircraft
afloat to further erode an already declining passenger-lifting
capacity. According to well placed industry sources three
unserviceable PIA aircraft, the premium wide-bodied long-haul Boeing
747s, are idling as scarp at the tarmac of Karachi airport for years
reducing the commercial fleet strength to about 38 aircraft including
many which had to be grounded reportedly for lack of spares and costly
maintenance works for want of funds. The carrying value of the three
747s mentioned above plus 2 Boeing 707, a Fokker F-27 aircraft
grounded by the airline in 1998 and 1999 and airframe of three other
707s, estimated at Rs 236.6 million by the management of the airline,
has been written down and is included in its current assets.
In addition, the financially troubled airline was
hit by many problems during the second half last year, including the
unscheduled grounding of the fleet of Airbus A 300 and the increased
fuel price in July and August.
And then came September 11 which resulted in
extremely high war risk insurance premium both for the aircraft, crew
and passengers and the closure of Afghan airspace which increased the
average flying time by an average 2 hours on lucrative European and US
routes. In addition, the restricted visa policies by the Western
countries for Pakistanis and other people in many countries of the
region in addition to a fear of flying turn an already bad situation
much more worse. The increased costs of enhanced security requirements
made the blow even stronger.
However, sources in the aviation industry insists
that even without 11.9 the aviation industry worldwide was heading
towards a recession after enjoying the peak for years. They further
added that with or without 11.9 PIA was heading towards the disaster
evident from its own financial reports in the recent years due
primarily to mismanagement, politically motivated over staffing and
lack of economic sense. To prove their point they said that PIA's
complain of reduced business in the aftermath of 11.9, domestic as
well on international routes, make hardly any sense due to airline's
reduced passenger carrying capacity for grounding of a number of
aircraft. They also shrug off PIA's claim of increased fuel price mid
last year which was countered by the airline by constantly increasing
its fares.
CHALLENGES AFTER CHALLENGES
As if 11.9 was not enough, the PIA faced fresh
challenges with the closure of Indian air space from January 1 this
year on the pretext of terrorist attack on the Parliament building in
New Delhi. The move was particularly aimed at hurting the national
flag carrier, the only domestic airline flying to Indian cities of
Delhi and Mumbai, Kathmandu in Nepal, Dhaka in Bangladesh and Colombo
in Sri Lanka. In addition, it was also meant to hurt the PIA which
served destinations in the Far East including Bangkok, Hong Kong,
Singapore, Manila/Tokyo by making these operations highly uneconomical
due to increased flying times resulting in increased costs.
And finally, the suicide bombing on May 8 in
Karachi further worsened an already bad situation due to substantial
drop in number of foreign travellers into the country. The gory
incident resulted in bringing the flow of foreign travellers to a
trickle in the country due to apprehensions about the law and order
situation and security and safety. In the later part of last month the
cloud of war hanging over the subcontinent due to tensions between two
nuclear-armed arch rivals — Pakistan and India — made the
situation even worse to deliver a blow to the aviation industry,
particularly the PIA and two private airlines as well as the Civil
Aviation Authority (CAA) which depends heavily on aeronautical revenue
— flyover rights; landing, parking and housing charges, and
technical landing charges (landings to get the fuel).
PAGE's talks with the officials of CAA and
private sector airlines strengthen the impression that the national
aviation industry — which primarily comprises of some 47 aircraft of
both the PIA and two private airlines, 42 airports only about half of
which are operational and the regulatory body CAA — reeks of
mistrust and absence of any concerted strategy to better address
present challenges. Each of them seem to be facing problems which do
not only sharply differ from each other but they also blame each other
for the fiasco which is resulting in increased dominance of PIA on the
domestic sector and foreign airlines on the overseas sector.
IS PIA TRYING TO REGAIN ITS MONOPOLY?
Talking to PAGE, the Managing Director of
Shaheen Air International, Air Vice Marshal (Retd.) Syed Ataur Rahman
accused PIA of resorting to fare-cutting tactics to deal a crushing
blow to private airlines to regain its monopoly on the domestic
sector. He also criticized the CAA for failing to regulate the air
fares, not only that related to the PIA but all airlines, particularly
those based in the Gulf, which has developed into a full-blown price
war threatening the very survival of the remaining private airlines.
"The Market Clean-Up Board of Pakistan is not regulating the
airfares, one of its primary functions, to help avoid the looming
disaster as both PIA and foreign airlines are increasingly offering
heavily discounted fares to turn the entire business uneconomical for
the private airlines including Shaheen.
"The cut-throat unethical competition is
hurting the aviation industry like never before as not only the PIA
but also the foreign airlines, particularly those based in the
lucrative Middle East hub, are offering ridiculously low fares to fill
in the seats — and they can afford to do so with their huge network
— to make business uneconomical for the private airlines. For
instance, PIA has slashed its Karachi-Lahore one-way fare by almost
half to Rs 2,300, which is lower than ours by Rs 2,600. The price war
has resulted in low yields making the business extremely uneconomical
for us.
"It's surprising that the PIA which never
before considered the private airlines worthy of competition,
particularly on the domestic sector, has suddenly chosen to compete
with the private airlines instead of competing with the foreign
airlines for both in- and out-bound foreign business. However, PIA
must realize that despite its orchestrated attempts to break the
private airlines it would not be successful to break them. We enjoy an
immense advantage as our employee to aircraft ratio compared is much
lower than the PIA which puts us in much more convenient position.
Compared to over 560 employees per aircraft for the PIA we have
between 70-75 employees per aircraft which allows us to use our
resources far more efficiently to limit our expenses."
Shaheen, he said, has a fleet of 5 aircraft — 3
short-haul Yak-42 D serving domestic sector on Karachi, Lahore,
Islamabad and Peshawar routes and 2 medium haul TU 154 serving six
overseas stations — all in the Gulf, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Al Ain,
Muscat, Doha and Kuwait. "However, the suicide bombing last month
and the ongoing tension arising from jingoist rhetorics from India has
already resulted in reducing the civilian air traffic into the country
from the hub in Dubai. In addition, the constantly declining
purchasing power, fear of flying and visa restrictions are all taking
a heavy toll on the aviation industry, the biggest sufferer of which
are the private airlines.
"There is only limited domestic business which
has to be shared between the PIA and private airlines and the
price-war started by the former is aimed at luring the domestic
travellers away from the private airline which have been offering
affordable fares all along. With the volume of domestic air travel
remaining the same — a daily average of 1,500 passengers to
Islamabad and average 1,400 to Lahore — the price war is
intentionally aimed at breaking the private airlines. Is the focusing
of attention of the PIA on the domestic sector is an indication that
it has thrown up the towel against the foreign airlines by tacitly
accepting that it can not compete with them anymore?"
HIGH INSURANCE COSTS
Ataur Rahman said not only the revenue is on a
constant decline but the operating costs have also been increased
substantially at the great financial discomfort of the private
airlines. "Insurance costs for the private airlines has been
doubled after 11.9. While state-owned Pakistan Insurance Corporation
come to the rescue of the PIA offering it the cushion to absorb the
increased insurance costs by the private airlines enjoy no such
facility remaining dependent on foreign insurers to absorb the
increased insurance costs. The war insurance surcharge imposed on the
private airlines should be abolish because the pretext of risk factor
on which the insurance costs were increased ended with the end of war
in Afghanistan.
"The particular once again highlights the
absence of level playing field for the private airlines vis-a-vis the
PIA in addition to the already mentioned failure of the relevant body
to regulate the fares depriving the former loss of substantial
business on the domestic sector to the later and on overseas Gulf
sector to the giant foreign airlines. The open sky policy has been
successful as despite many flaws it has brought domestic fares to an
affordable levels for the travellers. However, it would have been more
successful if it had been based on the globally accepted bilateral
basis to discourage foreign airlines to pick and drop passengers from
and to the country without offering any real benefit to the economy.
"The decreasing revenue and the soaring
expenditure, the absence of level playing field added with sharp
decline in passenger traffic due to fear of flying, visa restrictions,
declining purchasing power and the raging price war have taken a heavy
toll on the private airlines. Whhile the standard seat occupancy ratio
of 65 per cent and above is the standard breakeven bench mark for the
aviation industry worldwide, the private airlines in Pakistan are
facing extremely uneconomical competition both on the domestic and
overseas sectors without any action from the relevant quarters."
Ataur Rahman also stressed for reduction in import
duty on aircraft from 10 per cent to at least 5 per cent if not
altogether slashing of it as the total impact is very high to
encourage induction of aircraft in the private airlines. He informed PAGE
that Shaheen Air has plans to replace its fleet of all Eastern
European made aircraft by proper Western aircraft starting with the
induction of a Boeing 737-400 aircraft soon.
CAA
The civil aviation authority plays an important
role in the growth of aviation industry in any country and the same
also is true for Pakistan. The primary responsibility of the authority
is to provide safe and secure air space for commercial aviation as
well as to serve as a regulator to oversee issues related to civil
aviation be it efficient management of the airports, aircraft
registration, make by-laws governing the conduct of the management and
associated professionals such as pilots, bilateral agreements with
foreign carriers, etc., etc. In short, it is responsible for ensuring
safe and secure civil aviation operations within the airspace of a
country and in turn to encourage the growth of it. In fact, civil
aviation authority is viewed as one of the most important indicator of
the status of any aviation industry as its performance is directly
related to the commercial air traffic within any country.
The Deputy Director General of CAA, Air Vice
Marshal Arshad Rasheed Sethi, told PAGE that the organization
is losing an average of $ 3 million a month in the aftermath of 11.9.
"Upto late August 30 foreign airlines were operating in the
country. Just prior to 11.9 two of them closed their operations —
Sri Lanka due to terrorist attack at the Colombo Airport which
destroyed a number of aircraft and Russian airline Aerofloat for other
reasons. The closure of Afghan airspace by the then government on
September 16 dealt a severe blow to the CAA as it resulted in all
overhead traffic by depriving it a substantial amount of revenue from
route navigation fee from foreign airlines flying over the national
air space. The fall out of 11.9 resulting in decreased passenger load
further worsened when the coalition operation started in the
Afghanistan and the number of foreign airlines was reduced to 14 from
28. However, due credit should be given to the CAA for keeping the
national air corridors safe and secure for commercial operations
despite usage of the air space by the coalition forces."
Sethi said that CAA faced a serious revenue crunch
as overflight charges, which contributes substantial revenue to its
revenue, dried up from an average of 270 overflights a day to just
about 60 a day. "CAA being a purely autonomous body which gets no
grants or funds from the government manages to earn enough revenue to
meet its day to day expenses but the drying up of the revenue by as
much as $ 3 million a month is affected its development plans.
"The substantial reduction in commercial air
traffic with the closure of operations by 14 airlines, many of which
have restarted the operations albeit with lower frequency than before,
the fear of flying, the strict visa restriction slapped on travellers
from the region including Pakistan, have taken a heavy toll on the CAA.
The situation is getting better with time as 24 foreign airlines are
operating in the country. However, the May 8 incident proved to be
another disaster as it resulted in the suspension of operations by the
Singapore Airline.
"The slowing down of the economic activities
still use to take a heavy toll on the aviation industry here like
elsewhere in the world and so the air travel keeps of suffering, more
so as we don't have a tourist industry in the real sense of the world.
In other words, whatever little foreign traffic — be it business or
personal — was coming into the country has come to an almost full
stoppage and under the present tension between India and Pakistan the
present situation is just not good for the aviation industry of the
country.
'What poses even more problems for the CAA is that
the PIA as well as the remaining two private airlines as well as all
of that who have closed their operations owe CAA huge sums of money.
PIA owes CAA over Rs 6 billion while Aero Asia and Shaheen Air owe us
Rs 300 million each in dues which are outstanding for years. As of
January 1 this year, the CAA has slashed its landing, parking and
housing charges by 90 per cent on the domestic sector for the
convenience of the three airlines till end this month and its very
likely that we will extend it. The reduced charges has helped PIA to
save Rs 22 million alone in the first six month of this year and will
also provide a welcome relief to the other two private airlines."
Rejecting the reports perpetually appearing in the
media that CAA's aeronautical charges are high, Sethi said that it is
just not so. "Don't compare Karachi Airport with other
counterparts in the region, for instance Dubai which is the only
international airport of the country and where the civil aviation
authority owns not only the cargo handling company Dnata but is
allowed to own and operate duty free shops and the head of the
national flag carrier is also the head of the authority. Not a single
foreign airline has ever asked the CAA to reduce its tariffs."
He also rejected the reports that high jet fuel
prices is one of the major reason for reduction in operations of
foreign airlines in the country. "Jet fuel prices in Pakistan is
the cheapest in the region, even lower than that in Dubai, and that's
why despite the prevalent situation jet fuel sales at Karachi Airport
has more than doubled during the first six months of this year — $
5.4 million compared to $ 2.5 million compared to the same period last
year. As fuel makes up the largest single expense of any airline —
almost one-third of the total expenditure — the low jet fuel prices
have resulted in increased technical landings, landings neither for
cargo nor passenger pick-up but to get only the fuel, by the foreign
airlines into the country. The CAA's decision to slash its technical
landing charges by 50 per cent in September 2000 is finally paying a
dividend — for instance Air France which was having technical
landings of an average 10 flights a week increased its frequency to 40
flights per week. Though Air France stopped its operations later,
technical landings by many other foreign airlines have registered a
substantial increase."
Sethi said that unlike the rest of the world the
CAA is still heavily dependent on its aeronautical revenue which make
up about 85 per cent of its revenue from all sources. Globally the
ratio between aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenue in the rest of
the world is almost equal but various factors hamper the growth of the
non-aeronautical revenue for the CAA here."
COMPENSATION FOR LOSS
Sethi informed PAGE that the authority has
approached the Ministry of Defence to approach the relevant US
authorities to compensate for an average $ 3 month loss the CAA is
suffering since September last year. He also informed PAGE that
CAA has received the ISO 9002 certification on the 4th of this month.
"This is our commitment for quality and our contribution to
operational safety, quality flying standards, air worthiness and
licensing procedures."
DENOUEMENT
The major problems faced by aviation industry of
Pakistan revolve round reduced volume of air passenger, undeclared
price war on both the domestic and foreign sectors, extremely poor
financial health of the PIA, absence of level playing field, and
drastic increase in insurance costs.
The various players; PIA, private airlines and CAA,
have to work together to find solutions of the above issues which can
make or break the industry. The role of foreign operators and the
continuation of open sky policy in the absence of bilateral agreements
would keep on favouring the foreign operators at the cost of the
domestic operators.
Much has been done but much still remains to be
done to develop the national aviation industry on sound footing for
the ultimate of the national economy and to provide travellers with
real choice in terms of fare as well as facilities.
|