It is time for the policy
makers to take a deep hard look at the reasons that why the Shipping
Policy has failed
From SHAMIM
AHMED RIZVI
Islamabad
May 20 -June 02, 2002
The development of engineering industry world-wide
is characterised with an all out government support. In Pakistan this
support has not so far been so visible if not absent. As a consequence
our engineering industry remains far from achieving its true potential
in the face of tersing imports of capital goods. Due to vested
interest the country continues to have basically a cotton based
economy which offers limited opportunities for future expansion and
growth. For achieving major economic strides it is now essential that
our reliance is shifted to other high value added areas like
engineering goods industry otherwise we would be left far behind in
the 21st century world of science and technology.
Deficit financing, adverse balance of payment
situations and inflation are the key factors at the macro level that
are responsible for the economic disaster in Pakistan. At the micro
level it is our attaching low priority to the development of the
engineering industry and the adoption of negative attitude towards a
Research and Development (R&D) based policy promote the transfer
of technology and development of an indigenous industrial base that
have not provided any chance to self-reliance. The net result has been
the primary manufactures, low value addition and low level of
technology.
With the advent of WTO the economies are integrated
and only the most competitive and innovative shall survive. Keeping in
view the above fact there is a dire need of the longrun objective for
competitive industry, which may require simultaneous implementation of
the following three areas:
(a)
LEVERAGING
EXISTING INDUSTRIAL STRENGTHS.
(b) CREATING A
STRONG INTERMEDIATE SECTOR AND DOMESTIC LINKAGES.
(c) CREATING
EXTERNAI LINKAGES THROUGH FDI.
Realizing the importanee of long term planning the
present government decided in the year 2000 to formulate a ten-year
"Engineering Vision 2010" to achieve desired economic,
growth and become "Asian Tiger" in the foreseeable future.
This long term vision is based on export-led industrial strategy (to
increase 5 to 6 billion dollars exports of Enginnering Goods annually)
through diversification and deepening of the resource-based and
non-resource based industries. The emphasis will be on full
integration of manufacturing operations through value chain to enhance
industrial linkages and to increase productivity and competitiveness
by:
- 1) GLOBAL ORIENTATION:
- 2) PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR
INDUSTRY
- 3) PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT
AND QUALITY/STANDARD:
- 4) INDUSTRIAL DATABASE:
- 5) BALANCED REGIONAL
INDUSTRIALIZATION.
During the last two years, however, very little has
been achieved in terms of the objective of the vision. The Engineering
Development Board which is looking after the implementation of
engineering vision 2010, when approached to find out what exactly has
been done sofar to achieve the goods of the "vision" has
nothing concrete to show. In a written reply the chief coordinator of
the Board said.
In order to provide a growth led strategy for the
Engineering Industry it was decided to approach the task by dividing
the Engg. Industry into the following Sectors. Each sector being
headed by an experienced person being called the Sectoral head and
committee experienced persons functioning under the Sectoral head
would formulate a report on the sector covering all aspects of the
value chain as identified in the presentation made by SMEDA. A
Steering Committee (SC) was also formulated to not only provide the
guidelines for the development of the vision but also monitor the
progress at every stage. Mr. Almas Hyder was nominated as the Convener
of the Steering Committee.
The task of development of vision was being taken
under the auspices of the Engineering Development Board and the fact
that SMEDA carried the expertise for most of SME's that fell under the
various identified sectors their services are being utilized to
facilitate the achievement of the required goals. But the
institutional memory of all this exercise and implementation strategy
is resting with EDB. EDB and SMEDA are mustering additional, quality,
manpower to manage the exercise out the funds so provided.
Following are the Sectoral Committees with their
Convenors under working for Engineering Vision:
|
Sectoral
Committees |
|
Sr. |
Sector |
Members |
|
1. |
Heavy Engineering |
Mr. Towfiq Chinoy |
|
2. |
Casting and Forging |
Mr. Imtiaz Rastgar |
|
3. |
Automotive Sector
(Automobiles and automotive parts, Agriculture Implements) |
Mr. Sohail P. Ahmad |
|
4. |
Consumer Durables |
Mr. Kamal Abbasi |
|
5. |
Cutlery and surgical |
Mr. M. Ashraf |
|
6. |
Fans and Electrical Motors |
Mr. Muhammad Imtiaz |
|
7. |
Molds and Dies |
Mr. Nabeel Hashmi |
|
8. . |
Electrical Capital
Components |
Mr. Asim Jalil |
|
9. |
Ceramics and Non-Metal |
Mr. Tariq Rehman |
|
10. |
Electronics |
Mr. Mohsin Syed |
|
11. |
Light Engineering (bicycles,
machinery |
Mr. Arif Ejaz |
| manufacturing,
nuts & bolts, fastners etc) |
Various meetings were held in Islamabad, Karachi
and Lahore to deliberate and finalize the Vision under the
Chairmanship of Minister for Commerce, Industries & Production,
Secretary Industries & Production and Convenor of the Steering
Committee of Engineering Vision.
On April 21 & 22, 2002 a brainstorming meeting
was held under the Chairmanship of Minister for Commerce, Industries
& Production and fit was decided to initially focus on the
information that has been collected for the following sectors and the
progressive studies for the rest of the sectors to continue and once
all the sectors have been finalized this will form the 1st stage of
the growth led strategy for the Engineering Sector.
|