Among mango growing countries, Pakistan offers a
wide choice of more than 100 mango varieties
By M. MITHAL
JISKANI
Asstt. Prof. (Plant Pathology)
Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam
Mar 18 - 24, 2002
Mango, Mangifera indica L. is one of the
most important foreign currency earning fruit crop of Pakistan. It is
known as the "King of fruits". The mango is nutritionally
rich in carbohydrates and vitamin A and C. It is relished and liked by
every one for its flavour and dietetic value and is also claimed to be
of medicinal value. For instance, a chutney made from the green
(unripe) fruit is considered to be an effective antidote for mild
forms of sunstroke. Apart from this, unique mango recipe such as mango
ice cream, mango milk shakes, mango squashes etc. are favourite
desserts. Mango juice, jelly, marmalade, pickles etc. are also
commonly consumed.
In Pakistan, the mango is grown over an area of
94.1 (000) ha, while its production is 916.8 (000) tonnes. Its area in
Sindh is about 43.5 (000) ha, with 320.7 (000) tonnes production,
which is about 46.2 and 34.9 per cent of total area and production
respectively (Pakistan Statistics Year Book, 2001). According to
Export Promotion Bureau, Pakistan has exported 47,601,678 and 31,000
kg of fresh and dried (amchoor) mangoes with a value of 11,589.6 and
21.3 (000 dollars) respectively during July-June 1999-2000, to many
countries, mainly to Dubai, Saudi Arabia, UK, Germany, France,
Holland, Switzerland, Italy, Singapore and Malaysia.
Among mango growing countries, Pakistan offers a
wide choice of more than 100 mango varieties. Some of the most famous
varieties are Sindhri, Dusheri, Summer Behist, Chaunsa, Anwar Ratole
and Langra. These are differing in fruit characters, viz.: taste,
flavour, colour, tinges shape and size, traits that determine the
quality of the fruit and hence its market value at home and overseas.
At present, one late season, five mid seasons and six early seasons
(total 12) mango varieties are cultivated commercially in Sindh. These
varieties were released from 1949 to 1967, with yield potential of
8000 to 21600 kg/ha (Table). After that, no any popular variety has
been released of if is released, most of us are unaware to that!
The present situation of mango orchards, with
special reference to the province of Sindh, needs special attention,
where about all mango orchards are suffering due to an unknown disease
problem, causing dying of trees. It is really very difficult for me to
comment on what I see daily that many trucks running on road, loaded
with not a mango fruit but loaded with cutted mango weed logs! I can
neither define nor explain standard mango growers and contractors.
What I want to say about the despond labour involved in planting and
managing mango orchards, picking, packing, loading and transporting
mango fruits. Even I could not answer to question arose by worried for
mangoes!!
I do not know about entire situation (!?) , but
have personally visited many mango orchards and viewed badly declined
mango trees, because of an unknown problem, to which we may call
"disease". Because the disease can be defined as any
disturbance or deviation of a plant that interfere with its normal
structure, function or economic value. The diseases are usually caused
by living organisms, called pathogen, such as fungus, bacterium,
nematode and insect pest, regarded as infectious diseases. The
diseases may also be caused by other factors like physiological
disorders or due to changes in environmental conditions, and are
termed as non infectious. These diseases are caused due to low or high
temperature, unfavorable oxygen and soil moisture relations, injurious
atmospheric gases of chemical injury, lightening injury and
deficiencies or excesses of nutrients. The viruses are sometimes
considered living and sometimes as non living though are taken up
independent existence of their own. Therefore, plant diseases caused
by viruses are sometimes regarded as infectious and sometimes as
non-infectious. On the other hand, changes in environmental
conditions, due to global warming and the green house effect,
resulting in low rainfall, high Co2, air and water pollution, soil
degradation by drought, land erosion, salinity, waterlogging and
desertification also directly hit the crop as well as help to disease
causing organisms, so that they may develop more and could cause
abnormality (disease) in normal function, structure or economic value
of plants.
Any injury or abnormality brought about by insects
belong to the field of entomology. The remaining causes of all
disturbance and deviations are taken place in the field of plant
pathology. The plant pathology constitutes a big sector of plant
protection, is a study of nature, cause and prevention of plant
diseases. Crop protection is mother discipline of entomology and plant
pathology, is concerned with the health and productivity of growing
plants. The disease losses are hazards, can be minimized only by a
continuous process of research and education. To evaluate and solve
new disease problems, is the responsibility of the crop protection. To
work out practicable procedures, which growers can adapt to their
needs and in a result, the farmers must be benefited, is the aim of
crop protection.
Mango diseases recorded in Pakistan
However, the mango is known to suffer from a number
of diseases caused by different organisms, which affects different
parts of plants, at all stages of growth and development. Powdery
mildew (oidium mangiferae), sooty mould (Capnodium romasum
or Tripospermum acorium), fruit rot (Aspergillus niger),
leaf blight (pestaloptiopsis mangiferae), anthracnose (Glomerella
cingulata colletotrichum gloesporioides), stem blight or die back
(Diplodia spp.) and root rot (Rhizoctinia and Fusarium
species) are recorded as fungal diseases; bacterial leaf spot (Erwinia
mangiferae); and malformation of mango inflorescence (the actual
cause is still not confirmed) are reported from Pakistan. No
information regarding the extent of damage to the plant is available,
but some of these are certainly responsible for causing considerable
damage and become a limiting factor in many mango growing areas.
Symptoms of the diseases
Powdery mildew is one of the worst disease
affecting almost every variety and is common in all over Pakistan. It
appears from December to March, as superficial whitish or gray powdery
growth on the flowers and flower buds (inflorescence), tender leaves,
thin stem (shoots and trunk) and spreads to fruits. Infected flowers
fail to open and sometimes shed before being fertilized and results in
a substantial reduction of fruit set. If the fruit is already set, it
may drop off prematurely. The axis may begin to dry, showing
characteristic dieback symptoms, but dying of mango trees is not due
to this disease, it is an other unknown havoc disease.
Sooty mould appears as black velvety growth on the
leaf surface. The entire leaf surface or portion of the leaf may be
covered with fungal growth and in severe cases the whole plants
affected. The thin layer formed on the leaf surface can rubbed off
easily. Under the dry conditions this may be blown off as small
fragments by the wind. The disease causing fungi in true sense are non
pathogenic, however, photosynthetic activity of the plant is impaired
due to covering of the leaves. The symptoms occurring in diseased
orchards are different to that of this disease.
Fruit rot starts usually in the ripe and over ripe
fruits as spots of different colours, which soon increase in number
and size. Affected fruits may become soft, pulpy and unfit for
consumption. The present situation is so much away from this problem.
Leaf blight, initially appear as minute yellowish
spots on the upper surface of the mature leaves. The spots become more
in number, bigger in size and often coalesce, forming big irregular
patches. The lower size of the spot is brown in colour, while upper
portion becomes white in centre with a brownish purple margin that
separate diseased and healthy portion. Some of the symptoms are
present in infected mango trees.
Bacterial leaf spot is noticed on the leaves as
angular water soaked spots or lesions, surrounded by clear holes.
These become necrotic and dark brown and viscous bacterial exudates
deposit on these necrotic portions that become corky and hard after
drying. Sometimes, longitudinal cracks also develop on the petioles.
Some of the similar signs are present in suffering mango orchards.
Malformation is very common and widely distributed
in orchards (to a lesser or greater extent) in all over country.
Compact leaves formed at the apex of shoot or in the leaf axil, to
form the bunchy top seedlings and are usually shallow with few
tertiary roots. The tap root may be twisted and may show necrosis.
Sometimes, small leaves appear as shootlets, growth of which is
checked and several similar shootlets arise from the axil of the scaly
leaves and form bunches, which are thicker than the main stem. Floral
aggregation (malformation) may also appear on shortened primary axil
of the inflorescence, which flowers are borne in clusters and no fruit
or very poor fruit setting is observed. Infected inflorescence remains
green for long time, no malformed heads dry up in black masses but
persist on trees. The symptoms are persistent in almost all those
gardens in which pruning has not yet been done.
Anthracnose is prevalent in almost all parts of the
country. The leaves, petioles, twigs and fruits are attacked.
Appearance of oval and irregular blisters likes brown spots develop on
the tips, margins and centre of leaves and twigs. Blackening of
petioles, elongated necrotic streaks on young twigs and branches are
observed and leaves drop down from top to bottom. Drying and rupturing
of affected tissues, drying and falling of leaves, brightening of
blossoms, staining and rotting of fruits are also main symptoms of
anthracnose.
Stem blight or die back become evident by
discoloration and darkening of the bark, withering of leaf tips and
shedding of leaves, the twigs dying back from top to bottom. The
exudation of gum from infected portion is also one of the major
evident of this disease. Brown streaks are observed on vascular
tissues by length wise splitting of diseased twigs. Almost all mango
varieties are reported as susceptible to this disease.
Root rot is also prevalent in almost all orchards,
manifest itself as withering and drying of the plant from top to
bottom and whole plant die up. Initially rootlets are affected and are
rotten, later on the smaller, tertiary roots and ultimately the
bigger, secondary and primary main roots are infected which result in
gradual decline of the plant and the plant die. The uptake of
nutrients and water is blocked due to the rotting of the roots, which
results in drying of the plants.
Present situation?
This is on the disposal of individuals, who have
visited and are well aware to various problematic mango orchards, can
decide that what is the problem? I think it is clear from the symptoms
of anthracnose, stem blight or die back and root rot that present
problem is not because of any one disease. Perhaps, it is complicated
case emerged mostly due to combine attack of anthracnose, stem blight
of die back, root rot, leaf blight, bacterial leaf spot and
malformation diseases, which are responsible for the decline (dying of
trees). That may also be proved through the nature and behaviour of
these diseases causing organisms. High temperature, high relative
humidity and weak plants are main contributing factors in the spread
of anthracnose and die back, while root rot caused by Fusarium
species may develop more on weak plants, in high soil temperature and
drought conditions. It is also true that dying of trees or decline is
generally observed more in the neglected orchards, which is common
factor. Present shortage of irrigation water is another main cause,
that also help to the disease causing organisms to grow, develop and
spread more.
It is also pertinent to mention here that almost
all commercial mango varieties are old, which were released from 1949
to 1967. However, such old mango varieties are under cultivation. It
is question that how such varieties, after long period, could be
resistant to the diseases? More or less, all varieties are reported to
be susceptible, to most of the above discussed diseases. Now it is up
to the researchers what they would like to do for identification of
actual problem, how they control the existing disease or complicated
disease's case.
Research work on identification of disease problems
The following research achievements by several
research workers, has been reviewed, so that the mango growers or
contractors may easily decide to adopt preventive and curative
measures. Whereas, the researchers may also plan their future
strategies against this most destructive problem, for the benefit of
nation and country.
Florence (1989) reported that the fungi such as Botrydiplodia
theobromae, Alternaria, Acremonium, Scytalidium, Fusarium and Ceratocystis
stained both the surface and the deeper wood of mango. Sharma (1991)
observed that out of 219 isolates obtained from 225 diseased samples
from mango orchards, Botrydiplodia theobromae, Colletotrichum
gloeosporiodies [Glomerella cingulata], Pestalotia mangiferae, Phoma
sp., Scleratium [Corticium] rolfsii, Rhizoctonia solani, Diplodia sp.
and Fusarium solani were establishedas pathogenic. Mixed
infections were common. B. theobromae was the most frequent
isolate and appear to be the primary cause of die back in this region,
though other pathogens causing necrosis may facilitate invasion by B. Theobromae.
According to Kore and mane (1992) Fusarium solani infects mango
and disease development increased with decreasing soil moisture, with
maximum development at 22% soil moisture. While in same year
Narasimhudu and Reddy (1992) found that trees of the mango were
severely affected by gummosis. Botryodipladia theobromae was
isolated from diseased trees and pathogenicity was confirmed. Colyn
and Schaffer (1993) stated that Powdery mildew, floral malformation,
blossom blight [Dothiorella dominicana?] and bacterial black
spot (Xanthomonas campestris pv. Mangiferaeindicae) are most
important pre-harvest diseases/ disorders of mango. Whereas, Darvas
(1993) reported that Dothiorella dominicana has been identified
as an important pathogen of mango in South Africa. It was associated
with blossom blight, branch die-back, fruit stem-end rot and fruit
rot. Disease symptoms on the flowers are referred to as blossom
blight. The pathogen may continue to grow into the wood behind the
killed flower axis and cause branch die-back. It can also directly
infect branch tips causing die-back. The pathogen overwinter in
pycnidia formed in dead wood. No sexual stage of the fungus was found
in this study. Tsao et al. (1994) isolated Phytophthora palmivora
from infected crown and root tissues of mango showing crown and/or
root rot and wilt symptoms in the Philippines. Ploetz et al. (1996a)
sampled mangoes with decline symptoms from Florida, USA, and reported
that during artificial inoculation A. alternata, G. cingulata,
D. dominicana, B. theobromae and Phomopsis spp.
caused all or some decline symptoms that included bud necrosis, tip
dieback, gummosis and vascular discoloration. Ploetz et al. (1996b)
isolated Fusarium decemcellulare as a pathogen
associated with large galls of mango in the United States. On the
basis of the work done by above researchers it is concluded that mango
decline is a disease complex involving several different fungi.
Research work on control of diseases
Ahmed (1991) evaluated 8 different fungicides and
reported that, Dithane M-45 (mancozeb) gave the best control of
anthhracnose [Colletotrichum golelsporiodes (Glomerella
cingulata]) followed by Bordeauux mixture. Sooty mold (Capnodium ramosum)
was best controlled by Bordeaux mixture and Thiovit [sulfur].
According to Narasimhudu and Reddy (1992), the disease gummosis, Botryodiplodia
theobromae could be controlled using a paste of Bordeaux mixture
or carbendazim. Darvas (1993) well controlled the blossom blight,
caused by D. dominicana with benomyl (0.025% a.i.) sprays.
Sharma and Gupta (1994) evaluated the efficacy of 8 different
fungicides agianst Botrydiplodia theobromae Pat., casual
organism of canker and dieback of mango. Maximum disease control was
achieved by 1% Bordeaux mixture followed by 0.8% Bordeaux mixture and
carbendazim. The addition of borax, urea and NPK was not effective.
Sharma et al. (1993) controlled wilt of mango caused by Fusarium
solani (Mart.) Sacc. with carbendazim (0.1%) or captafol (0.25%),
when symptoms appeared was highly effective. Ahmed et al. (1995)
evaluated various fungicides against die-back disease caused by diplodia
natalensis in mango at their recommended doses and reported that
three foliar sprays of each of thiophanate-methyl (as Topsin-M) and
benomyl (as Benlate), at 1.5 g/liter and 0.5 g/liter, respectively,
were effective in controlling disease.
Conclusion and suggestions
It is concluded on the basis of personal expereince
and work reviewed that the present problem is not becasue of any one
disease, but mango decline is the combine attack of anthracnose, stem
blight or die back, root rot, leaf blight, bacterial leaf spot and
malformation diseases, involving several different fungi, which are
responsible for the dying of mango orchards. Therefore, it is
suggested that integrated disease management principles should be
applied by using different fungicides in combination with suitable
insecticides. Whereas, various cultural practices may also be helpful
to check the diseases. It must be kept in mind that use of fungicides
is not alone source. On the other hand, it is also pertinent to
mention here that the fungicides increase the cost of production.
Their use is risky for the health of worker. The fungicides decrease
the fruit quality because of their toxic substance residue, that may
remain present so much time in the fruit. Therefore, following
integrated disease management principles should be applied. The
researchers are requested to plan their future strategies against this
most destructive problem, for the benefit of nation and country.
Only healthy seeds, seedlings and plants should be
used for planting and budding or grafting.
Irrigation must be applied as per requirement, but
not subject to the availability.
Avoid high doses of nitrogen fertilisers, but apply
proper and balanced fertilizers, on the basis of soil type, age and
need of the tree.
Proper sanitation of orchards and pruning of trees
(diseased plants or plant parts should be removed and burnt) may help
to reduce the infection and growth, development and further spread of
the disease causing fungus or so.
Easily available broad spectrum fungicides should
be used, in combination with insecticides at proper dose.
However, modern mango production technology must be
adopted as per recommendations of researchers. The encouraging results
could be obtained with consulting pathologist and entomolgist.
|
Mango varieties, year of release and yield potential (kg/ha)
|
|
Name of variety |
Year of release |
Yield potential (kg/ha) |
|
Late season |
|
|
|
Neelum |
1965 |
11070 |
|
Mid Season |
|
|
|
Swarnarika |
1953 |
11070 |
|
Summer Behisht Chaunsa |
1959 |
9000 |
|
Benganpali |
1953 |
20430 |
|
Saleh Bhai |
1965 |
9450 |
|
Anwar Ratole |
1867 |
9900 |
|
Early Seaon |
|
|
|
Sindhri |
1949 |
21600 |
|
Zafran |
1958 |
12600 |
|
Siroli |
1953 |
8000 |
|
Langara |
1952 |
10000 |
|
Dusheri |
1951 |
12870 |
|
Gulab Khasa |
1959 |
9900 |
|
Source:
Introduction to Agriculture Research in Sindh. Directorate
General, Agricultural Research Sindh, Hyderabad, June, 1990. |
|