The KSE - Overview:
Updated on Feb
26, 2001
Do valuations matter? One is forced to address this issue
after observing the "Yo — Yo" behaviour of the Pakistan market,
since the start of this year. YTD, the KSE-100 has lost a net 4.4% — from
1507.60 on December 31, 2000 to 1440.43 last Friday. Market fundamentals have
changed some what during this period from the bottom up prospective. Hubco
showed positive earnings surprise while PTCL ended up with a negative earnings
surprise. Likewise for PSO and Shell, respectively. The macro picture also
continues to oscillate between hope and despair. While underlying fiscal and
monetary indicators are clearly showing improvement over their long term (past
five years) trends, the shorter-term (6-9 months) picture is still one of below
target tax revenues, pressure on forex reserves and the exchange rate, upward
trend in interest rates and continued sluggishness in agri and industrial
sectors causing near term spike in both blue collar and white collar
unemployment.
The market impact is that the KSE-100 Index has become range
bound and is being driven primarily by technical factors as institutional
investors have also shortened their time horizon and are, at least for now,
content to take profit of a few percentage points and return to cash positions
in their portfolios. Thus valuations have taken a back-seat for the time being.
The above, however, does not mean that valuations do not
matter. We believe that valuations do provide a signaling mechanism for
investors but for a medium to longer term perspective. What is more important is
to first assess valuations with respect to certain benchmarks and then attempt
to gauge what is the likely fair value of the market. With this base determined,
investors can then develop core portfolios around which they can actively trade
a certain portion of funds in an attempt to enhance their total return.
On all the above parameters, the Pakistan market has one of
the lowest (if not the lowest) valuations. How does one interpret this? Either
investors are completely missing the point or there is some other factor
operating here. Also, consider the following: in terms of average daily volumes
(in US$ terms) the Pakistan market has displayed much more liquidity and the
depth than many Asian markets.
This clearly highlights the trading nature of Pakistan market
as well as the potential for trading opportunities. At the same time, it
highlights the importance of analyzing and assessing trigger points for major
market moves. In each of the above years, there was a clear trigger event (or
events) that pushed the Index into new territory. Reasonable assessment of the
trigger event and rapid portfolio moves between cash and equities would thus
have been the key drivers of out performance.
SECTOR OUTLOOK
Synthetic fibre
The revenue impetus of the PSF sector is largely recognized
by the undulations in the commodity's cycle. Hence, after an outstanding FY00
performance, most PSF manufacturers are now preparing to embrace a much smaller
earnings growth in FY02.
High volumes and pricing power were the helm that Pakistan's
synthetic fibre sector steered to their advantage posting an approximate 24%
sales growth figure in FY00. More importantly, gross profits rose by 46% with
gross margins expanding to 16.8% from 14.2% in FY99. As a result sector earnings
were estimated to have grown by 62% in the period.
Domestic PSF demand continues to remain robust in FY01 due to
sharply higher local cotton prices this season, which touched a peak of PkR2800/maund
(around 88-89 cents/lb) in December verus PkR1400/maund last year. While cotton
prices have slipped down to PkR2300 levels currently, they remain sufficiently
high to allow continuing switch over into PSF by the textile industry. This
trend is likely to keep PSF demand growing by 10% in FY01, according to our
estimates, after discussions with leading textile producers.
However, our premise for predicting lower earnings in FY01 is
based on pricing, which does not present a very rosy picture. After two rounds
of reduction since November, the current price being charged by local PSF
producers is PkR66.8/kg, almost the same as landed cost of imported PSF. This is
a far cry from PkR71/kg which the PSF producers were charging in November 2000.
The key factor is the sharp pull down in international PSF prices that fell from
90 cents/kg prior to January to 75-76 cents/kg at present. Lower PSF demand from
the pivotal buyer, China, is said to be the main cause for this fall. We also
feel that overall demand for PSF is below expectations due to a slowdown in
textile exports orders from the USA and Europe.
MARKET ROUNDUP |
| .. |
LAST WEEK |
THIS WEEK |
% CHANGE |
|
Mkt. Cap (US$ bn) |
6.42 |
6.04 |
-5.92 |
|
KSE 100 Index |
1512.84 |
1440.43 |
-4.79 |
|
Total Turnover (mn shares) |
739.81 |
960.94 |
29.89 |
|
Value Traded (US$ mn.) |
587.72 |
491.84 |
-16.31 |
|
No. of Trading Sessions |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Avg. Dly T/O (mn. shares) |
147.96 |
192.19 |
29.89 |
|
Avg. Dly T/O (US$ mn) |
117.54 |
98.37 |
-16.31 |
|
MSCI Pakistan Index: |
|
Pak Rs. |
100.24 |
94.12 |
-6.10 |
|
US $ |
43.43 |
40.23 |
-7.37 |
|
.Source:
KSE, MSCI, KASB
|
|
| ASIA PACIFIC & AUSTRALIA |
| EXCHANGE |
INDEX |
LEVEL |
CHANGE |
EXCHANGE |
|
Bombay |
BSE |
4122.16 |
-140.39 |
-3.29% |
|
Hong Kong |
Hang Seng |
15280.56 |
+181.92 |
1.20% |
|
Singapore |
Straits Times |
1946.86 |
+2.24 |
0.12% |
|
Sydney |
S&P ASX 200 |
3292 |
-0.60 |
-0.02% |
|
Tokyo |
Nikkei |
13246 |
+172.64 |
1.32% |
|
|
.
|
|
| EUROPE & UNITED STATE OF AMERICA |
| EXCHANGE |
INDEX |
LEVEL |
CHANGE |
EXCHANGE |
|
Frankfurt |
DAX |
6146.8 |
-131.18 |
-2.09% |
|
London |
FTSE |
5922.9 |
-80.20 |
-1.34% |
|
Paris |
CAC |
5323.24 |
-129.24 |
-2.37% |
|
Dow Jones |
Industrial |
10441.90 |
-84.91 |
|
|
NASDAQ |
Composite |
2262.51 |
17.55 |
|
|