Updated on Aug
11, 2001
The KSE - Overview: Give us a trigger!!
The KSE-100 Index closed on Friday at 1226.85, down
14.59 points from 1252.59 last week. The market's failure to hold its
ground during this week resulted from large institutional selling in
shares of PSO. PTCL and Hubco, the leading blue chip stocks which
account for over half the volume traded on the KSE - 100 Index, also
came under heavy selling pressure during the week. Though there was no
concrete news regarding PTCL except rumors about strategic sale, the
selling in Hubco came after the company's announcement regarding the
interim dividend payout announced earlier this year. The extra time
being taken by the lenders for the approval of dividend payout
exacerbated the prevailing negative sentiments in the market,
prompting panic selling in some other major scrips also.
The KSE -100 Index, as a result, fell to an
intraday low of 1210.82 on Friday before correcting upward and closing
at 1226.85. We believe that the last minute buying spree, which
stopped the market from breaching its 1200 support level, occurred
because the KSE - 100 Index had fallen low enough for punters to jump
in and take positions in various low priced blue chip stocks. At the
same time, several short sellers also covered their positions before
the weekend.
We believe that the market's tight range bound
movement in the recent weeks has shown the indecisiveness of key
players regarding its future direction. The declining interest of
market players as evident by the falling volumes is a sign that the
market awaits some trigger to prompt serious and sustained reentry by
local investors. We believe that with such low valuations prevailing
in the market, the potential of a reversal is good if such a trigger
occurs. These triggers include a positive outcome from the upcoming
negotiations with the IMF. Recent revelations regarding the shortfall
in CBR revenue from June-end targets has heightened market tensions.
Any improvement in the law and order environment, particularly in the
commercial hub of Karachi will be positive for market sentiments.
Finally, a potential trigger may be the announcement of the roadmap
for transition to a democratic government. This has become very
important in light of the flak that General Musharraf has received
from the G-8 nations on his assumption of Presidency. A credible
roadmap would do much to allay these fears and ease the flow of
concessionary credit to Pakistan. Another sectoral trigger as early as
next week could be the announcement of large
development/infrastructure projects that could help basic industries
increase their capacity utilization for example cement, engineering,
electrical, and chemicals.
Meanwhile, corporate results and associated news
for 1H01 have started to flow into the market during the current week.
A 55% rise in profits of Bank AL Habib from last year shows an
improvement in performance of the financial sector going forward. The
fertilizer sector companies also announced their half-year results —
with Engro reporting a rise from its last half-year profits. On a
quarterly basis though, Engro showed a decline in its second quarter
profits, which resulted in selling in its scrip. Adamjee Insurance
also came under heavy selling pressure and closed at PkR33.7 on Friday
after losing over 17% of its share value (The news of potential
insurance claims from the UK and the UAE operations is believed to be
the reason for this fall in its stock price).
Looking towards the next week, technically the
market could show a short-term rebound, with the scrips that have
taken the most hits over the last week showing gains. While the Index
has the potential to test 1240 levels next week, we believe the
investors should continue to adopt a cautious stance. As before we
recommend that trading oriented players follow the five day weekly
cycle and buy in early in the week with clear exit level targets as
the Index tests its immediate resistance.
For longer-term players we are providing below our
fundamentally based earnings forecasts for FY01 and valuations. We
shall be frequently looking at this core universe and accordingly
updating our numbers and views.
Pharmaceutical Sector
Industry overview
The pharmaceutical industry in Pakistan comprises
over 400 licensed companies including both domestic firms and
multinationals. The MNCs in the sector, which number just over 30,
have about two-thirds of the market share. MNCs operating in Pakistan
in the pharmaceutical industry make very few generic building blocks
locally, and a large majority of both over-the-counter as well as
specialized drugs are imported in finished liquid, semi-liquid or
powder form into the country. These companies then package them in
capsules, bottles and cartons and market them to doctors across the
country. Most of these MNCs have even outsourced final packaging to
ancillary industries, and thus their major expenses are restricted to
Selling General and Administration and Marketing expenses.
Debate over price increase
Over the last few months, the pharmaceutical
companies' have come into the limelight in their efforts to get the
government to agree to a hike in price of both controlled and
decontrolled drugs. The debate continues to rage between the Pakistan
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (PPMA) and the Pakistan
Medical Association (PMA). The former claims that the industry finds
it hard to keep its head above water at the current retail price of
drugs while the latter laments that the price of most drugs has risen
beyond the reach of the common man.
The adoption of market-based exchange rates in July
2000 has led to a depreciation of 21% in the value of the Rupee as
against the Dollar. Since the MNC operations in the industry import a
large majority of their finished goods and raw materials from abroad,
and are in essence involved in marketing of those drugs in Pakistan,
SG&A becomes a critical cost component for these companies.
The nagging issue of value addition and real
profitability
There has been an ongoing debate regarding the real
profitability of pharma companies in Pakistan, particularly the MNC's
and what value addition they actually bring to their Pakistan
operations.
The MNC pharma industry complains that due to
restrictions on pricing of regulated drugs, their return on investment
in Pakistan is generally too low and does not even cover the pro rata
allocation to their global Research and Development (R&D) budgets.
They point out the low research-to-product ratio and long lead times
in bringing new drugs to the market as the main reason for high cost
of drugs. Thus, the industry argues that unless the government allows
a reasonable return on capital via high end prices they would be
unable to expand their operations in the country and introduce latest
drugs in the market at a consistent pace.
In this context, the pharma industry has welcomed
the recent decision by the government to allow up to 10% increase in
various categories of controlled drugs. However, the implementation
has again been delayed and there is uncertainty about the time frame.
The opposing view to that of the industry comes
from critiques who charge that, with rare exceptions, over the last 20
years the MNC's have not really brought any benefit to the country in
terms of basic research, technology transfer and any sustained effort
to foster pharmaceutical research in Pakistan's educational
institutions. They say that real value-added is missing because
multinationals simply import the key manufactured bulk drugs from
their home countries and simply finish them here rather than
manufacture from basic building blocks. With a huge demand from a
population base of 140 million, the MNC's can certainly do more to
improve their performance in this area. Further, the critiques point
to end-price discrepancies of some medicines between Pakistan and
India, saying that in the latter country many of these are much
cheaper even after stripping away duty and tax effects. While the
pharma industry takes a unified stand against such criticism,
increasing number of domestic pharma companies in the country do end
up benefiting from the outsourcing by MNC's, they do acknowledge areas
where the industry can do more to promote technology transfer and
guidance in basic research at educational institutions.
Nevertheless, from an investment perspective there
are both pluses and minuses regarding putting money into domestically
listed pharma stocks. The plus is of course steady growth and
stability of earnings along with reasonable payouts, while the minus
is stock illiquidity.
|
Stock
Market Synopsis |
|
|
Last
week |
This
Week |
%Change |
|
Mkt. Cap (US $ bn) |
4.92 |
4.84 |
-1.63 |
|
Total Turnover (mn shares) |
303.10 |
302.40 |
-0.23 |
|
Value Traded (US$ mn.) |
119.38 |
147.31 |
23.40 |
|
No. of Trading Sessions |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Avg. Dly T/O (mn. shares) |
60.62 |
60.48 |
-0.23 |
|
Avg. Dly T/O (US$ mn) |
23.88 |
29.46 |
23.40 |
|
KSE 100 Index |
1252.58 |
1226.84 |
-2.05 |
|
KSE All Share Index |
806.06 |
791.72 |
1.81 |
| ASIA PACIFIC & AUSTRALIA |
| EXCHANGE |
INDEX |
LEVEL |
CHANGE |
EXCHANGE |
|
Bombay |
BSE |
3316.21 |
-3.40 |
-0.10% |
|
Hong Kong |
Hang Seng |
11765.8 |
+49.04 |
0.42% |
|
Singapore |
Straits Times |
1641.43 |
-0.48 |
-0.03% |
|
Sydney |
S&P ASX 200 |
3401.3 |
-15.50 |
-0.45% |
|
Tokyo |
Nikkei |
11735.1 |
-19.50 |
-0.17% |
|
EUROPE
& UNITED STATE OF AMERICA |
|
EXCHANGE |
INDEX |
LEVEL |
CHANGE |
EXCHANGE |
|
Frankfurt |
DAX |
5433.49 |
-78.79 |
-1.43% |
|
London |
FTSE |
5427.2 |
+24.30 |
0.45% |
|
Paris |
CAC |
4846.02 |
-42.28 |
-0.86% |
|
Dow Jones |
Industrial |
10416.25 |
117.69 |
|
|
Nasdaq |
Composite |
1956.47 |
-6.85 |
|