Updated on July
14, 2001
Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari & Co. Ltd.
The KSE Overview: Has Bottoming Out Started?
Market activity remained generally dull throughout
last week with the KSE-100 Index ranging between 1297.91 and 1319.80.
The index broke downwards of the psychological level of 1300 on
Tuesday and dropped to an intraday low of 1287 on Wednesday, but
quickly recovered the same day. It closed up at 1311.76 points with an
increase of over 31% in trading volumes. However, intermittent foreign
selling kept PTCL and Hubco subdued and as a result, led to weak
market sentiments. The remainder of the week saw the index hovering
around 1311-1320 levels, hinting towards a potential stabilization
just above the psychological support level of 1300.
The KSE-100 Index has experienced continued
volatility over the last eight weeks, reaching a low of 1306. Weekly
trading volume has also remained fairly close to around 300mn shares
per week, although early in this period it did cross 500mn shares for
the week ending June 08, 2001. Sentiment in the post-budget period has
continued to remain on the weak side. The bearish sentiment was
further fueled by NAB's investigation of two brokerage houses in
Prudential Bank case. While rumors were that a further drop to the
support level of 1280 was probable, the market managed to prove
otherwise, with trading volumes increasing by around 5% to 308mn
shares. We believe that events such as the IMF approval of the third
tranche of US$133mn of the Stand-by Arrangement facility (US$596mn)
and the upcoming talks between Pakistan and India helped keep the
negative sentiments at bay at the close of last week.
The question of future direction of the Index is
still open. In our opinion, certain events (highlighted below) are
likely to play an important role in deciding the future direction of
the market.
a) Pakistan — India Summit to resolve
various political issues.
b) Official visit of Finance Minister Shaukat Aziz Washington
D.C. in October 2001 to attend the annual meeting of the World Bank.
Pakistan and IMF are meeting to start the first round of talks for
medium term Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF).
We believe that the above events — especially the
Summit talks next week, could prove to be the trigger for the market.
Pakistan's response so far has been very mature and non-committal but
cautiously optimistic. We believe that any reciprocal gesture by the
Indian government would be welcomed and could result in a turnaround
in the market sentiments.
The meeting of Pakistan's Finance Minister with the
IMF mission for PRGF in October 2001 is an important
confidence-building event itself for the market. Pakistan is trying to
qualify for the medium term loan facility and associated long term
external debt rescheduling. A longer maturity ladder would give
Pakistan enough time in instituting its structural reforms in place
and thus enable it to service its debt more smoothly in the future.
The approval of PRGF by the International lenders would thus result in
lower country risk for Pakistan, going forward.
Sector Review: Agriculture
It is instructive to go back to basics and assess
the ground realities on a periodic basis. In this context we are
devoting this weekly to the Agriculture Sector in Pakistan to briefly
provide an overview, and comment on intermediate term outlook for this
critically important sector of the economy.
As a famous saying goes "there is no life
without a plant", so it is with the place that agriculture holds
for Pakistan. Agricultural output directly accounts for 25% of the
country's GDP and has a high positive correlation (R2=0.81) with it.
However, through its impact on a host of other industries the real
influence of agriculture on the economy is much larger, in our
opinion. Furthermore, the sector is also a major source of export
earnings including that from cash crops (eg rice and cotton) and of
course textiles. It is therefore important for investors to take the
pulse of this sector from time to time as it may provide important
clues for future health of other industries including Textiles, PSF,
Cement and Building materials, FMCG's, etc and also for overall
economic outlook.
The last point is brought home aptly by the fact
the sharp decline in agri output by 2.5% in FY01 due to severe water
shortage, badly stunted overall GDP growth which was limited to 2.55%
despite 8% growth in large scale manufacturing. Further, according to
government sources, the problems with water shortage caused an
estimated loss of PkR95billion. Credit disbursement to the sector also
depicted declined by 8% to PkR40.89billion from PkR43.684billion in
the previous year.
Currently, with a geographic area of 196.7 million
acres, Pakistan only utilizes 25% land for cultivation. Of course a
huge portion of land is not cultivable due to geographic or climatic
reasons. Another significant portion is taken up by forestry and
grazing. At the same time, about 56.3 tonnes per hector is the current
yield against the potential of 186.1 tonnes per hector for our major
cash and food crops according to agricultural experts. This implies
there is significant potential for growth in not just the sector
itself but also other sectors related to it, if policy emphasis is
made effective.
There is thus a growing realization that to achieve
higher GDP growth rate, productivity of Agriculture Sector has to be
increased. For this purpose the government is providing support by
attempting to contain input costs, enhancing farmers' credit limit and
increasing the support prices of the major crops, albeit gradually.
The Food and Agriculture Ministry has also embarked on educating
farmers about the usage of appropriate quantity and quality and mix of
agrochemicals, which is critically important to optimize yields. This
year the GoP has enhanced farmers' credit limit from PkR40 billion to
PkR60 billion, an increase of almost 50%.
The potential of agricultural productivity boosting
our main export engine — textiles — is simply huge. Although not
really comparable, China's example in this area should open our
economic planners eyes to this aspect. According to reports, China's
textile exports were a mere US$3.2 billion in 1985. That is only 16
years ago. By 1990 — i.e. within five years, they increased to
US$7.0 billion — i.e. doubled. By 1997 these sky rocketed to over
US$40 billion and in 2000, total cotton and textile exports of China
were almost US$66 billion. This represents a compounded annual growth
rate (CAGR) of over 22% for a 15-year period. If our planners and
industrialists achieve only 50% of this in US$ terms, in 5-7 years,
our export picture would be dramatically different.
MARKET ROUNDUP |
| .. |
LAST WEEK |
THIS WEEK |
% CHANGE |
|
Mkt. Cap (US $ bn) |
5.10 |
5.15 |
0.98 |
|
Total Turnover (mn shares) |
294.23 |
308.87 |
4.97 |
|
Value Traded (US$ mn.) |
155.40 |
230.93 |
48.60 |
|
No. of Trading Sessions |
4 |
5 |
. |
|
Avg. Dly T/O (mn. shares) |
73.56 |
61.77 |
-16.02 |
|
Avg. Dly T/O (US$ mn) |
38.85 |
46.19 |
18.88 |
|
KSE 100 Index |
1306.29 |
1312.10 |
0.44 |
|
KSE All Share Index |
836.68 |
839.90 |
0.38 |
|
.Source: KSE, MSCI, KASB
|
|
| ASIA PACIFIC & AUSTRALIA |
| EXCHANGE |
INDEX |
LEVEL |
CHANGE |
EXCHANGE |
|
Bombay |
BSE |
3434.09 |
+57.88 |
1.71% |
|
Hong Kong |
Hang Seng |
12660.2 |
+132.30 |
1.06% |
|
Singapore |
Straits Times |
1672.81 |
+11.42 |
0.69% |
|
Sydney |
S&P ASX 200 |
3392.6 |
+14.60 |
0.43% |
|
Tokyo |
Nikkei |
12408 |
+402.84 |
3.36% |
|
|
.
|
|
| EUROPE & UNITED STATE OF AMERICA |
| EXCHANGE |
INDEX |
LEVEL |
CHANGE |
EXCHANGE |
|
Frankfurt |
DAX |
5882.4 |
+80.60 |
1.39% |
|
London |
FTSE |
5469.1 |
+77.20 |
1.43% |
|
Paris |
CAC |
4979.34 |
+64.66 |
1.32 |
|
Dow Jones |
Industrial |
10539.06 |
60.07 |
|
|
NASDAQ |
Composite |
2084.79 |
9.05 |
|
|