. .



Tobacco industry in Pakistan

  1. Making Pakistan Steel profitable
  2. Tobacco industry in Pakistan
  3. Indonesia to boost its exports
  4. Reconstitution of NFC

Smoking may not be good for health but it is certainly good for numerous national economies around the world, and Pakistan is no exception. This article intends to highlight the important role tobacco plays in the economics of the country, nothing more nothing less.

By Syed M. Aslam
Jul 31 - Aug 06, 2000

Tobacco industry — growing, manufacturing, distribution and retailing — contributed 4.4 per cent or over Rs 27.5 billion to the total GDP of Pakistan including Rs 15.17 billion, including Rs 14.54 billion in excise duty and sales tax, in 1997. It is the single biggest contributor of excise duty, six-times than that from cotton yarn. Over 5 per cent of all taxes collected in the country comes from the tobacco industry. It employs over one million people directly or indirectly which in terms of full-time equivalent jobs means 312,500 jobs supporting some 1.2 million persons.

The area under tobacco cultivation increased by 30 per cent during 1990-91 to 1998-99 — from 44,000 hectares to 57,000 hectares. The production has increased even more significantly during the same period — by 145 per cent from 75,000 tonnes to 109,000 tonnes. The value-added sector, the cigarette production, depicted a far more unproportionate increase of 72 per cent — from 29.8 billion sticks to 51.5 billion sticks during the same period.

Tobacco is the only crop grown in Pakistan whose yield is well above the world average and matches the per hectare yield in the US and other developed countries — an average yield of 1,900 kilograms per hectare. Tobacco industry — growing, manufacturing, distribution and retailing employs over one million persons directly or otherwise. This translates in the full time equivalent of 312,500 jobs supporting approximately 1.2 million persons. Manufacturing employs the highest number of persons — 35 per cent followed by 33 per cent by growing and 32 per cent in distribution and retail.

Smuggling

It is easy to understand the threat of huge revenue loss that presence and easy availability of smuggled cigarettes pose to the economy of Pakistan. The government is losing a substantial revenue of Rs 3 billion from the smuggling of cigarettes into the country. According to Aslam Khaliq, the director consumer and regulatory affairs of Pakistan Tobacco Company, the second top cigarette manufacturer after Lakson Tobacco, the government is losing at least Rs billion every year due to cigarette smuggling. He blamed the high taxation as the singular most important incentive for cigarette smuggling.

This is true if one looks at the global trends of taxation on cigarettes. Smokers in Pakistan pay the highest tax in the world second only to Denmark and the UK where 85 per cent and 82 per cent of the retail price respectively goes toward taxation. In Pakistan, 78 per cent of the retail price of premium brands ( all brands whose retail price is over Rs 10 per 20 sticks) and 58 per cent of the retail price of low segment brands go toward taxation.

Price war

Defending the price war started by PTC by slashing the prices of a number of its middle-priced brands early this year, Aslam said that it brought numerous domestic manufacturers in the excise duty and sales tax net. For instance, slashing the prices on some of its brand by 50 per cent from Rs 19 to Rs 9 reduced the excise duty from 63 per cent to 43 per cent with sales tax remaining unchanged at 15 per cent. Despite price reduction, Aslam said, PTC was able to break even due to increased turnover and at the same time forced manufacturers who did not pay excise duty and sales tax in the net to create a level playing field.

Though worried about smuggling and high taxation, Aslam expressed that cigarette prices in Pakistan are on the much low side. He said that the manufacturers should be allowed to increase the prices of their products to better their revenues which are constantly threatened by massive smuggling. He also suggested that price increases would help discourage smoking in the country.

True. Experience in many countries show that each 10 per cent increase in cigarette prices results in a 5 per cent decrease in the numbers of smoking adults and much more in young adults — between 6 to 8 per cent — who have little surplus funds to spend on smoke. However, the argument that high prices discourage smoking is a bit flawed particularly in the context of Pakistan.

Number one, unlike all developed and many developing countries Pakistan choose not to spend even a negligible portion of tobacco taxes on healthcare, research, education, and anti-smoking activities. Such developing countries, not to mention the developed ones, as Nepal and Peru spend a share of cigarette taxes to support cancer research and treatment. Latvia allocates 30 per cent of the revenue which it earns from the tobacco tax on healthcare. Iran earmarks a portion of tobacco tax revenue on healthcare and education.

Secondly, if the manufacturers and policy makers are really serious about reducing smoking in Pakistan through price increases — and no one say that they are — they need to raise taxes on all brands of cigarettes be it locally manufactured — imported. Supporting the domestic tobacco industry against imports, as is the case with Pakistan, may be good for the local industry but negates the very argument that higher prices and taxation discourages smoking.